Fase 4: Finalisasi Bagian D
Tujuan
Menulis Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah (~300 kata) yang inovatif untuk bagian D.2.
Target Scoring: Skor 4 = "Inovasi pendekatan = inovatif" (Bobot: 15%)
Output: D.2 narrative ~300 kata + referensi untuk diagram
Estimasi Waktu: 30-40 menit
Prerequisites: Fase 3 selesai (punya research questions + problem analysis)
WAJIB: D.2 harus mention diagram pendekatan (Gambar 1)
Mengapa Fase Ini Penting?
Pendekatan menentukan 15% scoring (inovasi pendekatan).
Skor 4 = "Inovatif" membutuhkan:
Genuinely innovative (NOT just "better" but "different")
Clear articulation of what's novel
Problem-solution fit logical
Feasibility signals strong
Implementation coherent
Setup Conversation dengan Claude
Mulai conversation BARU.
Prompt Setup
Saya menyusun proposal Penelitian Fundamental Reguler, sedang develop Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah (D.2).
KONTEKS:
- Topik: [paste]
- Research questions: [3 questions dari D.1]
- Target: Skor 4 = "inovatif" (Bobot 15%)
ATURAN:
1. Innovation harus genuinely novel, not incremental
2. Feasible dengan resources yang saya sebutkan
3. MUST mention diagram: "seperti diilustrasikan pada Gambar 1"
Konfirmasi paham.Main Prompt untuk D.2
JANGAN Gunakan akses web, Hanya gunakan data yang saya berikan!!
PENDEKATAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH (D.2)
Research Questions (dari D.1):
1. [paste Q1]
2. [paste Q2]
3. [paste Q3]
Gaps yang Di-address (dari SOTA):
- [Gap 1]
- [Gap 2]
- [Gap 3]
Innovation Details (dari Fase 0):
- Dimensi utama: [Technological/Methodological/Contextual/Theoretical]
- Spesifik apa yang baru: [Detailed description]
- Advantage over existing: [Kenapa lebih baik]
---
TASK: Tulis Pendekatan (~300 kata) dengan 3-paragraph structure
## PARAGRAF 1: Solution Architecture (80 kata)
### Framework:
- Overview approach: High-level solution description
- Theoretical foundation: What principles/theories support this
- Key differentiator: How different from conventional approaches
- Problem-solution fit: Why this approach suitable
### Template:
```
Penelitian ini mengusulkan pendekatan [innovation type] melalui [specific approach/method].
Berbeda dengan [conventional approach dari SOTA], pendekatan ini [key differentiator].
[Theoretical foundation/principle] memberikan dasar untuk [solution rationale yang
connect ke problem characteristics].
```
### Requirements:
- Name your approach clearly
- Contrast dengan existing (cite SOTA if relevant)
- Ground dalam theory/principles
- Logical connection to problem
---
## PARAGRAF 2: Innovation Integration (120 kata)
### Framework:
- Primary innovation: The main novel element
- Supporting innovations: Secondary novel aspects
- Synergistic effects: How components work together
- Technical feasibility: Why this is doable
### Template:
```
Kebaruan pendekatan ini terletak pada [primary innovation dengan detail spesifik]
yang memungkinkan [specific capability yang tidak bisa dilakukan existing approaches].
[Secondary innovation #1] memberikan [additional advantage] dibandingkan [existing alternative].
[Secondary innovation #2 jika ada] mendukung [complementary benefit].
Integrasi [innovation elements] menciptakan [synergistic effect] yang [performance improvement].
Seperti diilustrasikan pada Gambar 1, [technical enablers] mendukung implementasi
dengan [feasibility indicators].
```
### Requirements:
- Be VERY specific tentang innovation (not vague "uses AI")
- Explain benefit/advantage clearly
- Show integration/synergy if multiple components
- Signal feasibility (tools exist, team capable, data available)
- **MENTION diagram:** "seperti diilustrasikan pada Gambar 1"
---
## PARAGRAF 3: Implementation Strategy (100 kata)
### Framework:
- Key phases: 3-4 tahap utama
- Integration mechanism: How ensure coherence
- Critical success factors: What needs to go right
- Risk mitigation: Awareness of challenges
### Template:
```
Implementasi dilakukan melalui [X] tahap utama:
(1) [Phase 1 - brief description];
(2) [Phase 2];
(3) [Phase 3];
[(4) Phase 4 if applicable].
[Integration mechanism/quality control] memastikan [coherence/quality maintenance].
Faktor sukses kritis meliputi [CSF 1], [CSF 2] yang [enablement strategy].
[Risk awareness statement] dimitigasi melalui [mitigation approach].
```
### Requirements:
- Logical sequence of phases
- Clear purpose untuk each phase
- Integration/QC mentioned
- CSF identified
- Risk-aware (not naive optimism)
---
SCORING CRITERIA (Skor 4: "Inovatif"):
✅ MUST DEMONSTRATE:
- [ ] Genuinely innovative (NOT just "better CNN" but "fundamentally different approach")
- [ ] Clear articulation of what's novel
- [ ] Problem-solution fit logical
- [ ] Feasibility signals strong
- [ ] Competitive advantage over existing
- [ ] Implementation coherent
- [ ] Diagram mentioned
❌ AVOID:
- "Better" only (need "different")
- Vague innovation ("using advanced AI")
- Overselling ("revolutionary", "unprecedented")
- Implementation hand-waving
- Ignoring challenges
---
INNOVATION VALIDATION:
Self-check pada multiple dimensions:
| Dimension | Check | Score Target |
|-----------|-------|--------------|
| Novelty | Is it genuinely NEW or just incremental? | Novel = 5/5 |
| Technical Feasibility | Can team actually do this? | ≥4/5 |
| Competitive Advantage | Why better than existing? | ≥4/5 |
| Implementation Logic | Does sequence make sense? | ≥4/5 |
All should be ≥4/5 untuk demonstrate "inovatif"
---
WRITING GUIDELINES:
1. **Specificity is KEY:**
```
❌ Bad: "Menggunakan deep learning untuk diagnosis"
✅ Good: "Menggunakan hybrid CNN-Transformer dengan adaptive attention
mechanism untuk multispectral image analysis"
```
2. **Show, Don't Just Claim:**
```
❌ Bad: "Pendekatan ini sangat inovatif"
✅ Good: "Pendekatan ini mengintegrasikan X dan Y, yang belum pernah
dikombinasikan dalam konteks Z"
```
3. **Balance Confidence & Realism:**
```
❌ Bad: "Will revolutionize the field"
✅ Good: "Expected to advance current state-of-art by enabling X"
```
4. **Citations:**
- 4-6 references untuk methodology foundation
- Support theoretical grounding
- Cite enabling technologies if relevant
---
CRITICAL RULES:
1. **Diagram mention MANDATORY**: "seperti diilustrasikan pada Gambar 1"
2. **Innovation specificity**:
- Name specific techniques/algorithms/methods
- Not generic terms
3. **Feasibility balance**:
- Confident tapi not arrogant
- Acknowledge challenges
- Show mitigation
4. **WORD COUNT**: ~300 words (280-320 OK)
Distribute: 80/120/100
---
OUTPUT FORMAT:
```
### D.2: PENDEKATAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH
[Paragraf 1 - 80 kata tentang solution architecture]
[Paragraf 2 - 120 kata tentang innovation dengan "Gambar 1" mention]
[Paragraf 3 - 100 kata tentang implementation strategy]
[Word count: X kata]
---
### GAMBAR 1 - NOTES UNTUK PENELITI
Diagram should show:
- Input → Phases → Output flow
- Key components di each phase
- Integration points
- Expected outcomes
[Deskripsi singkat apa yang harus ada dalam diagram]
---
### DAFTAR PUSTAKA BARU (dari D.2)
[APA format, will append to cumulative refs]
---
### INNOVATION VALIDATION
| Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|-----------|-------|----------|
| Novelty | X/5 | [what's genuinely new] |
| Feasibility | X/5 | [why doable] |
| Advantage | X/5 | [why better] |
| Coherence | X/5 | [why logical] |
Target: All ≥4/5
```
---
BATASAN KATA:
- D.2 narrative: EXACTLY 280-320 kata (strict)
- Diagram notes: MAX 100 kata
- Innovation validation: MAX 30 kata per dimension
- Total output: MAX 700 kata
EXECUTE NOW, dan buat di artifact baru.Creating Diagram (Gambar 1)
Diagram is MANDATORY untuk D.2.
Option A: PowerPoint
Open PowerPoint → Insert → SmartArt → Process
Add boxes untuk each phase
Add arrows showing flow
Add text describing key activities
Export as high-res PNG
Option B: draw.io
Go to https://app.diagrams.net
Create flowchart
Export as PNG/SVG
Option C: Minta Claude Generate SVG
Buatkan diagram untuk pendekatan penelitian saya:
Phases: [paste 3-4 phases dari D.2]
Key components: [list]
Requirements:
- Flowchart showing Input → Process → Output
- Show key activities dalam each phase
- Clean & professional
Output: svg.edit dengan Inscape https://inkscape.org atau recreate di PowerPoint
Recommended size:
Width: 15-18 cm
Resolution: 300 DPI
Caption format:
Gambar 1. Diagram pendekatan penelitian [your innovation]
untuk [application context]Common Issues & Quick Fixes
Issue 1: Innovation not specific enough
Innovation description terlalu generic.
Instead of: "Menggunakan AI"
Say: "Menggunakan [specific algorithm] dengan [specific modification]
untuk [specific task]"
Provide revised innovation description dengan detail teknis.Issue 2: No diagram mention
Output tidak mention Gambar 1 (WAJIB requirement).
Add reference ke diagram dalam Paragraf 2:
"...seperti diilustrasikan pada Gambar 1."
Revise untuk include diagram reference.Issue 3: Feasibility concerns unclear
Implementation terlihat challenging tapi tidak address feasibility.
Add:
1. Resources/tools available yang support ini
2. Team expertise yang relevant
3. Risk mitigation untuk anticipated challenges
Revise implementation section.Expected Output
Setelah fase ini, Anda punya:
✅ D.2 Narrative (~300 kata):
Penelitian ini mengusulkan [specific novel approach]. Berbeda
dengan [existing], pendekatan ini [differentiator].
Kebaruan terletak pada [primary innovation] yang [capability].
[Secondary innovations]. Integrasi menghasilkan [synergy].
Seperti diilustrasikan pada Gambar 1.
Implementasi melalui [X] tahap: (1) [phase 1]; (2) [phase 2];
(3) [phase 3]. [Integration]. CSF meliputi [factors].
[Risk mitigation].✅ Diagram reference untuk create Gambar 1
✅ Innovation validated dengan all dimensions ≥4/5
Final Integration Check
Setelah D.1-D.3 complete, verify coherence:
Logical Flow Check
Citation Check
Innovation Thread
Next Steps (Beyond This Guide)
Immediate Tasks
Create Gambar 1 (diagram pendekatan)
Compile Daftar Pustaka (consolidate dari semua fase)
Polish language (flow, grammar, style)
Remaining Sections
D.4: Peta Jalan Penelitian (~100 kata + diagram)
E: Metode Penelitian (~1000 kata + diagram alir)
F: Hasil yang Diharapkan
G: Jadwal Penelitian
H: Daftar Pustaka (final compilation)
A: Judul (refined)
B: Ringkasan (synthesized)
C: Kata Kunci (3-5 keywords)
Good luck dengan proposal Anda! 🚀
Fase 4 dari 4 - Pendekatan Pemecahan Masalah | Penelitian Fundamental Reguler Proposal Development Guide
🙏 Terima kasih telah menggunakan Panduan Proposal AI.
Semoga panduan ini membantu Anda menyusun proposal penelitian yang berkualitas dan berhasil mendapatkan pendanaan dari Dikti.
Last updated
On this page