Fase 2: Pengembangan Konten Bagian D

Tujuan

Synthesize data dari Scopus jadi State of the Art narrative (~300 kata) untuk bagian D.3 proposal.

Target Scoring: Skor 4 = "menggunakan pendekatan baru" (Bobot: 12%)

Output: D.3 narrative ~300 kata + gap analysis + 30 references

Estimasi Waktu: 45-60 menit

Prerequisites: Fase 1 selesai (punya CSV dengan 30 articles)

Setup Conversation dengan Claude

Mulai conversation BARU untuk fase ini.

Prompt Setup

Saya peneliti menyusun proposal Penelitian Fundamental Reguler untuk Dikti, sedang develop State of the Art (D.3).

KONTEKS:
- Topik: [paste topik dari Fase 0]
- Target: Skor 4 pada kriteria "State of art dan kebaruan" = "menggunakan pendekatan baru"
- Bobot kriteria: 12% dari total penilaian

ATURAN:
1. Base HANYA pada data articles yang saya berikan
2. JANGAN tambah artikel atau data lain
3. JANGAN buat asumsi tentang full text (work with abstracts only)
4. Jika perlu info dari full text, tandai [VERIFY FULL TEXT: ...]

Konfirmasi Anda paham.

Main Prompt untuk SOTA

Setelah Claude konfirmasi setup, gunakan prompt ini:

JANGAN Gunakan akses web, Hanya gunakan data yang saya berikan!!

SOTA CONSTRUCTION dari 30 Artikel Q1

Topik penelitian: [paste topik]

Gap yang akan saya address (dari Fase 0 validation):
- [paste key gaps yang identified]

---

Saya memiliki file CSV hasil tambang dari Scopus yang lengkap dengan abstract. 
Periksa project knowledge untuk file CSV tersebut. Gunakan untuk SOTA CONSTRUCTION.

---

TASK: Synthesize SOTA (~300 kata) untuk D.3 dengan struktur 3-paragraf

## PARAGRAF 1: Current State of Knowledge (180 kata)

### Requirements:
- Overview field dengan established knowledge base
- Thematic synthesis: Group findings by frameworks/approaches
- Show evolution dari 2020 → 2024
- Highlight key advances
- Cite dengan [1][2][3] merujuk ke article numbers
- Present tense untuk established knowledge
- Present perfect untuk recent developments

### Template Structure:
```
Penelitian tentang [field] telah berkembang signifikan dalam lima tahun 
terakhir. [Established work dengan citations]. [Thematic grouping of 
approaches]. [Evolution timeline 2020-2024]. [Major contributions and 
key advances].
```

---

## PARAGRAF 2: Critical Gaps (75 kata)

### Requirements:
- Transition: "Namun, beberapa gap signifikan tetap ada..."
- Specific limitations dari established studies [cite]
- Contextual gaps: Geographic/domain specific [cite if mentioned]
- Methodological challenges: Technical issues unresolved [cite]
- Every gap claim must cite specific articles
- Quantify when possible ("only 3 studies in context X")

### Template Structure:
```
Namun, beberapa gap signifikan tetap ada. [Specific gap 1 dengan cite]. 
[Gap 2 dengan quantification]. [Gap 3 contextual/methodological]. 
[Connect gaps to research opportunity].
```

---

## PARAGRAF 3: Innovation Positioning (45 kata)

### Requirements:
- Gap-to-innovation bridge
- Specific novelty: [Technological/Methodological/Contextual/Theoretical]
- Expected contribution: Realistic advancement claims
- Clear differentiation from existing work

### Template Structure:
```
Penelitian ini address gaps tersebut melalui [specific novel approach] 
yang [key differentiator]. Kontribusi utama adalah [expected advancement 
yang specific dan measurable].
```

---

## GAP ANALYSIS (Detailed)

Dari 30 abstracts, identifikasi gaps:

### Knowledge Gaps
- What's theoretically unexplained? [cite specific articles]
- What phenomena remain understudied? [evidence]

### Methodological Gaps
- What are stated limitations? [cite articles]
- What technical challenges unresolved? [evidence]

### Contextual Gaps
- Geographic gaps: [Indonesia missing? Other contexts?]
- Domain gaps: [sectors not covered?]
- Scale gaps: [micro vs macro?]

### Integration Gaps
- Cross-disciplinary opportunities? [evidence]
- Multi-method combinations missing? [evidence]

**FORMAT untuk setiap gap:**
```
Gap: [specific description]
Evidence: Articles #[X, Y] state "[brief quote/paraphrase]"
Impact: [why this matters]
```

---

SCORING ALIGNMENT (Skor 4: "menggunakan pendekatan baru"):

✅ MUST DEMONSTRATE:
- [ ] Current approaches well-understood
- [ ] Their limitations clear
- [ ] Your approach addresses limitations with NEW element
- [ ] Not just "better" but "different" approach

❌ AVOID:
- "Banyak penelitian serupa" framing (Skor 1)
- "Penelitian belum banyak" only (Skor 2)
- Vague novelty claims
- Overselling ("unprecedented", "revolutionary")

---

CRITICAL RULES:

1. **Citation accuracy**: Every claim traceable to article number(s)
   Format: [1], [2][3], [1,5,8] for multiple

2. **No hallucination**: If abstract doesn't provide info, write [NEED FULL TEXT: what info]
   DO NOT invent findings

3. **Specificity**: "Only 3 studies in Indonesia" NOT "limited studies"

4. **Word count**: ~300 words total (280-320 acceptable)
   Distribute: 180/75/45

---

OUTPUT FORMAT:

```
### D.3: STATE OF THE ART DAN KEBARUAN

[Paragraf 1 - 180 kata dengan citations [1][2][3]]

[Paragraf 2 - 75 kata dengan citations]

[Paragraf 3 - 45 kata]

[Word count: X kata]

---

### GAP ANALYSIS (Detailed)

[Knowledge Gaps dengan evidence]
[Methodological Gaps dengan evidence]
[Contextual Gaps dengan evidence]
[Integration Gaps dengan evidence]

---

### DAFTAR PUSTAKA (30 References)

[APA format, alphabetically sorted]

[1] Author, A., & Author, B. (Year). Title. Journal, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/...
[2] ...
[... all 30 references]
```

---

BATASAN KATA:
- SOTA narrative: EXACTLY 280-320 kata (strict)
- Gap analysis: MAX 400 kata total
- Justifikasi per gap: MAX 50 kata
- Total output: MAX 1000 kata

EXECUTE NOW. Base semua analisis pada articles yang saya berikan, dan buat di artifact baru.

Common Issues & Quick Fixes

Issue 1: Claude cite articles di luar 30 yang diberikan

Output cite artikel yang tidak ada dalam 30 articles yang saya berikan.

Revisi dengan STRICT rule:
- HANYA cite articles #1-#30 yang saya provide
- JANGAN tambah referensi lain

Revisi SOTA sekarang.

Issue 2: SOTA terlalu generic/vague

SOTA terlalu generic. Revisi dengan MAX specificity:

Instead of: "Limited studies"
Say: "Only 3 studies (articles #5, #12, #18)"

Instead of: "Recent advances"
Say: "2024 saw X development [cite #28, #30]"

Revisi dengan specificity berdasarkan data dari abstracts.

Issue 3: Word count over/under

Word count current: [X] kata
Target: 280-320 kata

[If OVER: Trim redundancy, maintain critical citations]
[If UNDER: Expand dengan specific examples from articles]

Revisi ke target word count.

Next Step

Proceed ke FASE 3: Latar Belakang (03-Fase-3-Latar-Belakang.md)

Bawa:

• SOTA narrative (untuk context)

• Gap analysis (untuk justify problem)

• Innovation positioning (untuk preview solution)

Estimasi waktu: 45-60 menit

Success indicator: SOTA ~300 kata, scoring-aligned, all citations traceable

Fase 2 dari 4 - SOTA Construction | Penelitian Fundamental Reguler Proposal Development Guide

Last updated 19 days ago