Fase 3: Implementasi Bagian D

Tujuan

Menulis Latar Belakang dan Rumusan Masalah (~400 kata) yang compelling untuk bagian D.1.

Target Scoring: Skor 4 = "Ketajaman perumusan masalah = tajam" (Bobot: 15%)

Output: D.1 narrative ~400 kata + 3 SMART research questions

Estimasi Waktu: 30-40 menit

Prerequisites: Fase 2 selesai (punya SOTA + gap analysis)

Mengapa Fase Ini Penting?

Latar Belakang menentukan 15% scoring (ketajaman perumusan masalah).

Skor 4 = "Tajam" membutuhkan:

• Problem specific dan measurable (NOT generic)

• Evidence dari ≥5 credible sources

• Stakeholder impact quantified

• 3 SMART research questions

Persiapan Evidence

PENTING: Siapkan data ini SEBELUM mulai prompt (akan makan waktu jika cari sambil jalan).

Evidence yang Perlu Dikumpulkan

## EVIDENCE FOR URGENCY

### 1. STATISTIK MASALAH
Data konkret magnitude:
- [Statistik utama tentang masalah]
- Source: [BPS/Kemenristek/World Bank/WHO/FAO/dll - RESMI]
- Year: [recent data]

Contoh:
"Kerugian akibat penyakit tanaman mencapai Rp 50 triliun/tahun (BPS, 2023)"

### 2. INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON
Perbandingan dengan negara lain:
- Indonesia: [X%]
- Negara maju: [Y%]
- Source: [credible international body]

Contoh:
"Produktivitas padi Indonesia 5.2 ton/ha vs Jepang 6.8 ton/ha (FAO, 2024)"

### 3. STAKEHOLDER IMPACT
Siapa terdampak, berapa banyak:
- Primary: [X juta petani/pasien/siswa]
- Secondary: [Y institusi/perusahaan]
- Source: [credible data]

### 4. COST-OF-INACTION
Estimasi kerugian jika tidak diselesaikan:
- Annual cost: [Rp X atau Y% GDP]
- 5-year projection: [trend]
- Source: [economic analysis/reports]

### 5. TIMING FACTORS
Kenapa urgent NOW:
- Recent policy: [relevan policy baru]
- Technology maturation: [enabling tech now available]
- Crisis/opportunity: [time-sensitive factors]

SUMBER YANG VALID:

• ✅ Government: BPS, Kemenristek, Kementerian terkait

• ✅ International: World Bank, WHO, FAO, OECD, UNESCO

• ✅ Academic: Peer-reviewed publications

• ❌ Blog posts, news articles tanpa data source, Wikipedia

Setup Conversation dengan Claude

Mulai conversation BARU.

Prompt Setup

Saya menyusun proposal Penelitian Fundamental Reguler, sedang develop Latar Belakang (D.1).

KONTEKS:
- Topik: [paste topik]
- Gap dari SOTA: [paste key gaps dari Fase 2]
- Target: Skor 4 = "perumusan masalah tajam" (Bobot 15%)

ATURAN:
1. Use ONLY evidence yang saya berikan
2. JANGAN buat statistik/data fiktif
3. Jika data missing, tandai [ANDA PERLU CARI: ...]

Konfirmasi paham.

Main Prompt untuk D.1

JANGAN Gunakan akses web, Hanya gunakan data yang saya berikan!!

LATAR BELAKANG DAN RUMUSAN MASALAH (D.1)

Topik: [paste]

Gap Analysis dari SOTA (Fase 2):
[Paste key gaps yang akan di-address]

---

EVIDENCE YANG SAYA PUNYA:

[Paste semua evidence yang sudah dikumpulkan - statistik, comparison, 
stakeholder impact, cost-of-inaction, timing factors]

---

TASK: Tulis Latar Belakang (~400 kata) dengan 3-section structure

## SECTION 1: Compelling Context (100 kata)

### Framework:
- Opening hook: Striking fact/statistic untuk grab attention
- Broad significance: Why this matters beyond immediate context
- Credibility signals: Authoritative sources
- Emotional connection: Tanpa melodrama

### Template:
```
[Striking statistic dengan source] menunjukkan [specific problem]. 
[International comparison] mengungkapkan [magnitude of gap]. 
[Expert/authority statement atau policy] menekankan [urgency]. 
[Broader context] membuat masalah ini [critical importance].
```

### Requirements:
- Lead dengan strongest statistic
- Cite every data point dengan [1], [2], [3]
- Professional tone (urgent tapi tidak panic)

---

## SECTION 2: Problem Analysis (200 kata)

### Framework:
- Evidence layering: Build case systematically
- Multiple dimensions: Economic + Social + Strategic impact
- Trend analysis: Show problem accelerating/persisting
- Causal relationships: Why problem exists/persists

### Template:
```
Data [source] menunjukkan [quantified impact] yang [trend direction]. 
[Primary stakeholder] mengalami [specific consequences] berupa [measurable effects]. 
[Secondary stakeholder] juga terdampak melalui [ripple effects].

Analisis [time period] mengungkapkan [pattern/trend] dengan [specific indicators]. 
Faktor penyebab meliputi [cause 1], [cause 2], dan [cause 3].

[Cost-of-inaction] memproyeksikan [future consequences] jika tidak ditangani. 
[Timing factors] membuat intervensi menjadi [time-critical].
```

### Requirements:
- Layer evidence: quantitative + qualitative
- Show multiple stakeholders affected
- Demonstrate urgency dengan trend
- Connect to gaps dari SOTA
- Cite all claims [1][2][3]

---

## SECTION 3: Research Questions (100 kata)

### Format:
```
Berdasarkan analisis tersebut, penelitian ini merumuskan pertanyaan:

1. [Primary question - addresses main gap from SOTA]

2. [Secondary question - comprehensive understanding]

3. [Third question - practical validation/application]

Pertanyaan-pertanyaan ini [methodology justification brief] dan 
[preview innovation opportunity].
```

### SMART Criteria untuk SETIAP question:

**Specific:** Clear scope, not "How to improve X" but "What is effect of Y on X in context Z"

**Measurable:** Observable outcomes, quantifiable dengan proposed methods

**Achievable:** Realistic dengan team capabilities, feasible dengan resources

**Relevant:** Directly addresses gap dari SOTA, contributes to field advancement

**Time-bound:** Completable dalam research duration (1-2 tahun)

---

SCORING CRITERIA (Skor 4: "Tajam"):

✅ MUST HAVE:
- [ ] Problem specific dan measurable (NOT generic "improve quality")
- [ ] Evidence dari ≥5 credible sources
- [ ] Stakeholder impact quantified (X juta people/institutions)
- [ ] International comparison included
- [ ] Trend showing urgency (getting worse OR window closing)
- [ ] Cost-of-inaction calculated
- [ ] 3 SMART questions
- [ ] Questions connected to SOTA gaps

❌ AVOID:
- Vague problem ("education quality poor")
- No data support
- Generic research questions
- Unmeasurable outcomes
- Unrealistic scope

---

WRITING GUIDELINES:

1. **Evidence Integration:**
   - Cite semua data dengan [1], [2], [3] dalam sistem nomor
   - Layer: stats → impact → trend → cost
   - Use contrast untuk amplify (Indonesia vs others)

2. **Tone:**
   - Professional & urgent (not melodramatic)
   - Confident (backed by evidence)
   - Solution-oriented (not just complaining)

3. **Flow:**
   - Smooth transitions between sections
   - Build momentum: Context → Problem → Questions
   - Logical progression towards research imperative

---

CRITICAL RULES:

1. **NO FAKE DATA**: Use ONLY evidence saya berikan
   If missing: "[ANDA PERLU CARI: BPS data tentang...]"

2. **SMART VERIFICATION**: Check each question meets all 5 criteria

3. **WORD COUNT**: ~400 words (380-420 OK)
   Distribute: 100/200/100

---

OUTPUT FORMAT:

```
### D.1: LATAR BELAKANG DAN RUMUSAN MASALAH

[Section 1 - 100 kata dengan citations]

[Section 2 - 200 kata dengan citations dan trend analysis]

### RUMUSAN MASALAH

Adapun rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah:

1. [Question 1 - SMART]

2. [Question 2 - SMART]

3. [Question 3 - SMART]

[Word count: X kata]

---

### DAFTAR PUSTAKA BARU (dari D.1)

[APA format untuk sources baru, akan di-append ke refs dari D.3]

[X] Author... (Year). Title. Source. DOI
...

---

### SMART VERIFICATION

| Question | S | M | A | R | T | Status |
|----------|---|---|---|---|---|--------|
| Q1 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | PASS |
| Q2 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | PASS |
| Q3 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | PASS |
```

---

BATASAN KATA:
- D.1 narrative: EXACTLY 380-420 kata (strict)
- Justifikasi SMART: MAX 20 kata per kriteria
- Total output: MAX 800 kata

EXECUTE NOW.

Common Issues & Quick Fixes

Issue 1: Claude invented statistics

Output mengandung statistik yang tidak saya berikan.

Revisi dengan STRICT compliance:
1. HANYA use data yang saya provide
2. Jika data missing, tulis "[ANDA PERLU CARI: source untuk info X]"

Revisi sekarang.

Issue 2: Research questions not SMART

Research question #[X] tidak meet SMART criteria:

Issue: [Specific issue - e.g., "Not measurable - no clear metrics"]

Revise question #[X] untuk ensure:
- [Specific criterion that's missing]

Berikan revised question dengan SMART verification.

Issue 3: Problem too broad/vague

Perumusan masalah terlalu broad.

Current: "Kualitas pendidikan Indonesia masih rendah"
Better: "Literasi sains siswa SMP Indonesia (score 395) 20% di bawah 
        rata-rata OECD (489) berdasarkan PISA 2022"

Revisi dengan MAX specificity:
- Quantify problem
- Specify context
- Cite data source
- Compare benchmarks

Revisi latar belakang.

Next Step

Proceed ke FASE 4: Pendekatan (D.2) (04-Fase-4-Pendekatan.md)

Bawa:

• Research questions (akan di-address)

• Gap analysis (dari SOTA)

• Innovation dimensions (dari Fase 0)

Estimasi waktu: 30-40 menit

Success indicator: D.1 ~400 kata, 3 SMART questions, evidence-based urgency

Fase 3 dari 4 - Latar Belakang | Penelitian Fundamental Reguler Proposal Development Guide

Last updated 19 days ago